| |
|
|
Book
review:
The Shops: how, why and where to shop
India Knight, Viking, £12.99
Reviewed by John Kampfner
Monday 15th December 2003
I remember returning from Moscow and East Berlin, from the fall
of the Wall and the collapse of communism, to the London of the
self-indulgent
mid-1990s and being overtaken by fury. What on earth drives these
people to write mindless articles about shops, restaurants, about
what to
wear, what not to wear? In the intervening decade, I fear, I have
lapsed. I have become a manic shopper.
I shop in particular - and peculiar - ways, but I have grown to
like it, to love it. I have to shop on my own. I try to avoid weekends
and
other busy periods. I have to know what I am looking for (even
if I emerge with more than I bargained for). I usually set myself
a ten-minute
deadline per shop (for my clothes, my wife's clothes or anything
else), and I try where possible to keep away from department stores
or any
place where I can't see out on to the street. I am told this is
a very male form of shopping. It is quite mathematical. Possibly
it reveals
signs of madness. But when it works - and it usually does - it
is a highly satisfying experience. It was after this confession
one afternoon
at the New Statesman office that I, someone who is supposed to
obsess about wars and politics, agreed to review three books about
shopping.
I didn't think I would find retail communion with India Knight,
someone whose newspaper columns would fall into the dippy lifestyle
category
I so abhor, but there was something curiously appealing about her
mini-essays in The Shops: how, why and where to shop (Viking, £12.99).
Part of the appeal is purely practical. I confine my online retail
therapy
to plane tickets and books, so I was grateful for the handy tips
on the best internet sites for everything from florists and supermarkets
to organic butchers and fishmongers, of which there is such a lamentable
dearth in London. She provides a useful "dos and don'ts" of
Belgian chocolates (my biggest passion, along with croissants,
until I gave them up last May).
Towards the end of The Shops, and a pithy little encyclopaedia
it is, she offers help for those whose imagination and originality
are in
inverse proportion to their spending power, with a carefully tailored
list of presents for godchildren of varying ages. The girly facial
stuff didn't seem to break new ground (if I see another plug for
spas, I really will get cross, or jealous). The book's greatest
merit is
Knight's advice on locating the items you really need. Such as
wigs. Now I also know where to find vestments, reliquaries, chalices,
crucifixes
and church chairs. The piece de resistance, accompanied by drawings
of six dildos in different shapes and sizes, is a page on sex aids
mainly for women.
The other two offerings were much more up my street, and less enticing
for it. You can tell that London's Shops: the world's emporium
by Tara Draper-Stumm and Derek Kendall has been pub-lished by English
Heritage
(£12.95). It is very safe. It is glossy. It is a coffee-
table book. But it is also informative. It distils the history
of my two
favourite markets - Spitalfields and Columbia Road. It tells me
more than I knew, and probably would ever need to know, about two
places
I look down on to from the top deck of the number 38 bus in Bloomsbury
- James Smith & Sons, purveyor of umbrellas and walking sticks
for more than a century, and then, farther along the road, Sicilian
Avenue, one of London's few uncovered shopping arcades, which I
have yet to see anyone actually walk down. The authors are far
too polite
to juxtapose the beauty of the locations they have chosen with
the tat that masquerades as the modern high street shopping experience.
In a similar vein, but more substantial, is English Shops and Shopping
by Kathryn A Morrison (Yale University Press, £30). It is
what it says it is: an architectural history. But it is also a
social
history. The book uses the shop to chronicle the development of
Britain's towns
and cities. It recounts how much of the atmosphere of the West
End of London was formed by shops moving out of the City after
the Great
Fire of 1666. It points to the Victorian development of the department
store from the draper's shop, and comes up with observations such
as this:
An exhibition-hall-style building, designed to enhance interior
display and invite customers to wander about - Emile Zola's image
of the cathedral of consumption - did not suit the sales techniques
that prevailed in English drapers' shops . . . Into the first quarter
of the 20th century, English shoppers continued to be apprehended
by shopwalkers, and seated in bentwood chairs at counters where they
were attended by well-dressed assistants. They were even escorted
ceremoniously from department to department, much to the annoyance
of Continental and American visitors, who wished to walk freely around
stores.
Fast-forward past the co-operative stores, the penny bazaars, the
birth of Marks & Spencer and Boots, to Liberty and Harrods, to
the arrival of the Elephant and Castle shopping centre and Birmingham's
Bull Ring, and you end up at the out-of-town meccas that seem to
loom over every horizon. The aerial photograph of the Bluewater shopping
centre in Kent resembles a cross between the Pentagon and GCHQ .
. . which takes me back into more familiar territory - politics.
Knight concludes with 12 commandments about how to shop: buy online;
don't be intimidated by poor service; expensive doesn't necessarily
mean good; cheap doesn't necessarily mean bad; there is no such thing
as good taste; don't be overambitious; it's the little things that
make you happy; set yourself a budget and stick to it; there is no
catharsis in the splurge; be organised; shun the big shops; and,
finally, enjoy yourself.
"It goes without saying that shopping can be political," Knight
writes. "That's the beauty of shopping. It always matters." I'm
sure her politics are not my politics. But, then again, we seem to
agree on what really matters in life.
This review first appeared in the New
Statesman and may not be reproduced
without permission.
|
|
|
|